The Stiftung Warentest lowers the thumb: A cell phone has been cut off in the current comparison of catastrophic and was rated as “poor”. Potential buyers should be from a Smartphone prefer the Finger.

Company look with awe on the Stiftung Warentest. The judgment of the since 1964, the existing generation of Consumers can decide the success and failure of a product. A total of 24 current mobile phones has the Foundation were tested with test lastbetween cost 150 euros and 2,100 euros. Really bad only a Smartphone section, the Test with the grade “Poor” ended: the fair phone 3.

Fair phone 3 Harrell at Stiftung Warentest

Although the tester to point out the “promising approach” in the fair phone 3, which is characterized by an environmentally-friendly material procurement and fair treatment of workers, but in the rain test, the fair phone 3 could not convince at all. After a short rain shower, the phone had already given up the Ghost. Even if it was easier to repair than others, the Stiftung Warentest, could something like that apply “as a particularly sustainable.”

Also in the sub-categories of the fair phone 3 could not stand out particularly and in most fields a “Satisfactory”. Only in the handling of the Stiftung Warentest for the Smartphone assigns the grade of “Good.”

The manufacturer advertises the benefits of the Fairphone 3:

Test winner of the Stiftung Warentest is the Galaxy S20 5G

The test winner was the Samsung Galaxy S20 5G, the goods of the Stiftung Warentest is praised mainly for its Display and the camera. In the current Test, Samsung wins even twice, for the category of best Smartphone under 400 Euro decides the Galaxy A51 for themselves. Who would not want to spend more than 200 Euro, so guessing it’s the tester should pick up a Motorola One Macro.